A counterexample showing the semi-explicit Lie-Newmark algorithm is not variational
Nawaf Bou-Rabee, Giulia Ortolan, Alessandro Saccon

TL;DR
This paper provides a counterexample demonstrating that the semi-explicit Lie-Newmark algorithm is not variational, indicating its limitations for long-term simulations of rigid body systems.
Contribution
It introduces a specific counterexample that disproves the variational property of the Lie-Newmark method, highlighting its potential drawbacks.
Findings
Lie-Newmark algorithm is not variational
Counterexample involves a rigid body in a static potential
Method is less suitable for long-time simulations
Abstract
This paper presents a counterexample to the conjecture that the semi-explicit Lie-Newmark algorithm is variational. As a consequence the Lie-Newmark method is not well-suited for long-time simulation of rigid body-type mechanical systems. The counterexample consists of a single rigid body in a static potential field, and can serve as a test of the variational nature of other rigid-body integrators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical methods for differential equations · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
