Reply to the Comments on the XENON100 First Dark Matter Results
The XENON100 Collaboration

TL;DR
This paper responds to criticisms of the XENON100 dark matter experiment's analysis, clarifying the extrapolation of scintillation efficiency at low energies where data is lacking.
Contribution
It provides clarifications and defenses of the original analysis, addressing specific criticisms about extrapolation methods used in the dark matter search.
Findings
Clarifies the extrapolation of L_eff at low energies.
Addresses criticisms regarding data and theoretical models.
Reaffirms the validity of the original analysis.
Abstract
The recently submitted preprint on the first results from the XENON100 dark matter experiment (arxiv:1005.0380) was followed by a criticism by J.I. Collar and D.N. McKinsey (arxiv:1005.0838), focused on our extrapolation of the scintillation efficiency L_eff to the lowest nuclear recoil energies, where no data and no theoretical model exist. Here we add clarifications on our analysis and comment on their criticism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Computational Physics and Python Applications
