The Evolution of M_*/M_BH Between z=2 and z=0
Benny Trakhtenbrot, Hagai Netzer

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method to estimate the ratio of stellar mass to black hole mass across different redshifts, revealing its dependence on black hole mass and significant evolution from z=2 to z=0.
Contribution
The study presents a novel approach combining observational correlations to track M_*/M_BH evolution, emphasizing the importance of black hole mass dependence and host galaxy star formation activity.
Findings
M_*/M_BH depends on black hole mass at all redshifts.
M_*/M_BH increases by a factor of 4-8 from z=2 to z=0.
Evolution is steeper than previous reports when considering only star-forming hosts.
Abstract
We propose a novel method to estimate M_*/M_BH, the ratio of stellar mass (M_*) to black hole mass (M_BH), at various redshifts using two recent observational results: the correlation between the bolometric luminosity of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and the star formation rate (SFR) in their host galaxies, and the correlation between SFR and M_* in star-forming (SF) galaxies. Our analysis is based on M_BH and L_bol measurements in two large samples of type-I AGN at z~1 and z~2, and the measurements of M_*/M_BH in 0.05<z<0.2 red galaxies. We find that M_*/M_BH depends on M_BH at all redshifts. At z~2, M_*/M_BH 280 and ~40 for M_BH=10^8 and M_BH=10^9 M_sol, respectively. M_*/M_BH grows by a factor of ~4-8 from z~2 to z~0 with extreme cases that are as large as 10-20. The evolution is steeper than reported in other studies, probably because we treat only AGN in SF hosts. We caution that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
