Exo-Earth/Super-Earth Yield of JWST plus a Starshade External Occulter
Joseph Catanzarite, Michael Shao

TL;DR
This study evaluates the potential of combining JWST with a starshade external occulter to detect habitable exoplanets, highlighting strategies to reduce false alarms and improve detection rates with prior astrometry.
Contribution
It introduces a dual-strategy approach for exo-Earth detection, emphasizing the benefits of prior space-based astrometry to significantly increase yield and reduce false alarms.
Findings
Approximately 0.9 to 2.7 exo-Earths detected depending on eta_Earth.
Prior astrometry increases exo-Earth yield by about five times.
Probability of zero detections drops below 1% with prior astrometry for eta_Earth=0.1.
Abstract
We examine the scientific viability of an imaging mission to find exo-Earths combining the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) with a starshade external occulter under a realistic set of astrophysical assumptions. We define an exo-Earth as a planet of 1 to 10 Earth masses orbiting in the habitable zone (HZ) of a solar-type star. We show that for a survey strategy that relies on a single image to detect an exo-Earth, roughly half of all exo-Earth detections will be false alarms. Here, a false alarm is a mistaken identification of a planet as an exo-Earth. We consider two survey strategies designed to mitigate the false alarm problem. The first is to require that for each potential exo-Earth, a sufficient number of detections are made to measure the orbit. When the orbit is known we can determine if the planet is in the habitable zone. With this strategy, we find that the number of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
