Radio and X-ray Observations of the Type Ic SN 2007gr Reveal an Ordinary, Non-relativistic Explosion
Alicia M. Soderberg, Andreas Brunthaler, Ehud Nakar, Roger A., Chevalier, Michael F. Bietenholz

TL;DR
This study presents comprehensive radio and X-ray observations of SN 2007gr, demonstrating it is an ordinary, non-relativistic Type Ic supernova with properties consistent with typical stellar explosions, contradicting previous claims of relativistic outflow.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed multi-wavelength data and modeling that confirm SN 2007gr's non-relativistic nature, challenging earlier reports of relativistic velocities and clarifying its explosion characteristics.
Findings
SN 2007gr has a blastwave velocity of ~0.2c.
The explosion's energy is approximately 2 x 10^46 erg.
The circumstellar environment matches typical stellar wind profiles.
Abstract
We present extensive radio and X-ray observations of the nearby Type Ic SN 2007gr in NGC 1058 obtained with the Very Large Array and the Chandra X-ray Observatory and spanning 5 to 150 days after explosion. Through our detailed modeling of these data, we estimate the properties of the blastwave and the circumstellar environment. We find evidence for a freely-expanding and non-relativistic explosion with an average blastwave velocity, v~0.2c, and a total internal energy for the radio emitting material of E ~ 2 x 10^46 erg assuming equipartition of energy between electrons and magnetic fields (epsilon_e=epsilon_B=0.1). The temporal and spectral evolution of the radio emission points to a stellar wind-blown environment shaped by a steady progenitor mass loss rate of Mdot ~ 6 x 10^-7 solar masses per year (wind velocity, v_w=10^3 km/s). These parameters are fully consistent with those…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
