Detection of a Pseudobulge Hidden Inside the "Box-Shaped Bulge" of NGC 4565
John Kormendy, John C. Barentine

TL;DR
This study reveals a hidden pseudobulge in NGC 4565, challenging previous assumptions about galaxy bulge composition and suggesting many similar galaxies lack classical bulges, impacting galaxy formation theories.
Contribution
The paper identifies a pseudobulge in NGC 4565 using infrared imaging, showing it is much less luminous than the boxy bar and revising the galaxy's bulge-to-total luminosity ratio.
Findings
Detected a distinct pseudobulge with a Sersic index around 1.5.
Revised the bulge-to-total luminosity ratio to approximately 0.06.
Challenged the hierarchical galaxy formation model for large pure-disk galaxies.
Abstract
Numerical simulations show that box-shaped bulges of edge-on galaxies are not bulges: they are bars seen side-on. Therefore the two components that are seen in edge-on Sb galaxies such as NGC 4565 are a disk and a bar. But face-on SBb galaxies always show a disk, a bar, and a (pseudo)bulge. Where is the (pseudo)bulge in NGC 4565? We use archival Hubble Space Telescope H-band images and Spitzer Space Telescope 3.6 micron wavelength images, both calibrated to 2MASS K_s band, to penetrate the prominent dust lane in NGC 4565. We find a high surface brightness, central stellar component that is clearly distinct from the boxy bar and from the disk. Its brightness profile is a Sersic function with index n = 1.55 +- 0.07 along the major axis and 1.33 +- 0.12 along the minor axis. Therefore it is a pseudobulge. It is much less luminous than the boxy bar, so the true pseudobulge-to-total…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
