Standardization of 241Am by digital coincidence counting, liquid scintillation counting and defined solid angle counting
C. Balpardo, M. E. Capoulat, D. Rodrigues, P. Arenillas

TL;DR
This paper compares three methods—digital coincidence counting, liquid scintillation counting, and solid angle counting—for standardizing 241Am, demonstrating their consistency within 0.3% and analyzing uncertainties in detail.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive comparison of three standardization techniques for 241Am, highlighting their agreement and detailed uncertainty analysis.
Findings
All three methods agree within 0.3%
Uncertainty analysis detailed for each method
Solution will be sent to the International Reference System
Abstract
The nuclide 241Am decays by alpha emission to 237Np. Most of the decays (84.6 %) populate the excited level of 237Np with energy of 59.54 keV. Digital Coincidence Counting was applied to standardize a solution of 241Am by alpha-gamma coincidence counting with efficiency extrapolation. Electronic discrimination was implemented with a pressurized proportional counter and the results were compared with two other independent techniques: Liquid Scintillation Counting using the logical sum of double coincidences in a TDCR array and Defined Solid Angle Counting taking into account activity inhomogeneity in the active deposit. The results show consistency between the three methods within a limit of a 0.3%. An ampoule of this solution will be sent to the International Reference System (SIR) during 2009. Uncertainties were analysed and compared in detail for the three applied methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques · Radioactivity and Radon Measurements · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
