Different response of the crystal structure to isoelectronic doping in BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 and [Ba(1-x)Sr(x)]Fe2As2
Marianne Rotter, Christine Hieke, Dirk Johrendt

TL;DR
This study reveals that isoelectronic P-doping in BaFe2As2 suppresses magnetic order through structural reorganization, unlike Sr-doping, due to changes in Fe-As bonds affecting magnetic properties and superconductivity.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that subtle structural differences caused by P- versus Sr-doping explain their contrasting effects on magnetism and superconductivity in iron pnictides.
Findings
P-doping causes Fe-As bond contraction, suppressing SDW.
Sr-doping does not significantly change Fe-As bonds.
DFT models confirm structural effects on magnetic suppression.
Abstract
Superconductivity up to 30 K in charge neutrally doped BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 has been ascribed to chemical pressure, caused by the shrinking unit cell. But the latter induces no superconductivity in [Ba(1-x)Sr(x)]Fe2As2 in spite of the same volume range. We show that the spin-density-wave (SDW) state of BaFe2As2 becomes suppressed in BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 by a subtle reorganization of the crystal structure, where arsenic and phosphorus are located at different coordinates z(As), z(P). High-resolution X-ray diffraction experiments with BaFe2[As(1-x)P(x)]2 single crystals reveal almost unchanged Fe-P bonds, but a contraction of the Fe-As bonds, which remain nearly unchanged in [Ba(1-x)Sr(x)]Fe2As2. Since the Fe-As bond length is a gauge for the magnetic moment, our results show why the SDW is suppressed by P-, but not by Sr-doping. Only the Fe-P interaction increases the width of the iron 3d…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
