Anomalous variance in the WMAP data and Galactic Foreground residuals
M. Cruz, P. Vielva, E. Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez, R. B. Barreiro

TL;DR
This study confirms a significant anomaly in the WMAP data's variance, likely caused by Galactic foreground residuals, which could impact cosmological parameter estimation.
Contribution
The paper improves variance estimation methods and demonstrates the anisotropic variance distribution, linking it to Galactic foreground residuals and the quadrupole-octopole alignment.
Findings
Anomaly confirmed with p-value of 0.31% using five-year WMAP data.
Higher variance found near the Galactic plane, indicating anisotropy.
Removing low multipoles eliminates the anomaly, suggesting a common origin.
Abstract
A previous work (Monteser\'in et al. 2008) estimated the CMB variance from the three-year WMAP data, finding a lower value than expected from Gaussian simulations using the WMAP best-fit cosmological model. We repeat the analysis on the five-year WMAP data using a new estimator with lower bias and variance. Our results confirm this anomaly at higher significance, namely with a p-value of 0.31%. We perform the analysis using different exclusion masks, showing that a particular region of the sky near the Galactic plane shows a higher variance than 95.58% of the simulations whereas the rest of the sky has a lower variance than 99.96% of the simulations. The relative difference in variance between both regions is bigger than in 99.64% of the simulations. This anisotropic distribution of power seems to be causing the anomaly since the model assumes isotropy. Furthermore, this region has a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
