On finite complete rewriting systems and large subsemigroups
K.B. Wong, P.C. Wong

TL;DR
This paper proves that if a semigroup has a finite complete rewriting system, then any large subsemigroup of it also has one, establishing a two-way relationship between the properties of the semigroup and its large subsemigroups.
Contribution
It demonstrates the converse of a known result, showing that finite complete rewriting systems are preserved when passing to large subsemigroups, with a purely combinatorial and constructive proof.
Findings
If $S$ has a finite complete rewriting system, then so does any large subsemigroup $T$.
The proof is purely combinatorial and constructive.
Establishes a two-way relationship between semigroups and their large subsemigroups regarding rewriting systems.
Abstract
Let be a semigroup and be a subsemigroup of finite index in (that is, the set is finite). The subsemigroup is also called a large subsemigroup of . It is well known that if has a finite complete rewriting system then so does . In this paper, we will prove the converse, that is, if has a finite complete rewriting system then so does . Our proof is purely combinatorial and also constructive.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Advanced Algebra and Logic
