Reply to "Comment on Anderson Transition in Disordered Graphene"
M. Amini, S. A. Jafari, F. Shahbazi
TL;DR
This paper clarifies that the small numerical effects discussed in a comment do not account for the mobility edge in graphene as previously predicted, reaffirming the original findings.
Contribution
It refutes the claim that minor numerical effects explain the mobility edge in graphene, reaffirming the original theoretical prediction.
Findings
Small numerical effects are not responsible for the mobility edge.
The original prediction of the mobility edge in graphene remains valid.
The comment's suggested explanation is incorrect.
Abstract
We show that the very small numeric effects discussed in the comment by Schleede et al (arXiv:1005.0497) is not the source of mobility edge predicted in graphene in our letter [Eur. Phys. Lett., 87 (2009) 37002].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraphene research and applications · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics