The Production of Probabilistic Entropy in Structure/Action Contingency Relations
Loet Leydesdorff

TL;DR
This paper develops a probabilistic framework linking societal communication systems and human actions, integrating theories from sociology, AI, and information theory to analyze their dynamic interactions and stability.
Contribution
It introduces a general algorithm for probabilistic structure/action contingency by combining sociological and AI theories, with an empirical example.
Findings
Probabilistic entropy production in social systems
Stabilization mechanisms in communication-action relations
Application of Shannon's information theory to social dynamics
Abstract
Luhmann (1984) defined society as a communication system which is structurally coupled to, but not an aggregate of, human action systems. The communication system is then considered as self-organizing ("autopoietic"), as are human actors. Communication systems can be studied by using Shannon's (1948) mathematical theory of communication. The update of a network by action at one of the local nodes is then a well-known problem in artificial intelligence (Pearl 1988). By combining these various theories, a general algorithm for probabilistic structure/action contingency can be derived. The consequences of this contingency for each system, its consequences for their further histories, and the stabilization on each side by counterbalancing mechanisms are discussed, in both mathematical and theoretical terms. An empirical example is elaborated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Decision Making · Embodied and Extended Cognition · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
