Leading-Order Actions of Goldstino Fields
Haishan Liu, Hui Luo, Mingxing Luo, Liucheng Wang

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the leading-order Goldstino actions, comparing the Akulov-Volkov action with the constrained superfield formalism, and clarifies their relationships and equivalence in terms of S-matrix elements.
Contribution
It provides explicit expressions for the Akulov-Volkov actions and clarifies how different formulations relate and produce equivalent physical results.
Findings
S_KS and S_AV/S_AV^ch yield the same S-matrix elements
Explicit expressions for S_AV and S_AV^ch are presented
The relationship between different Goldstino actions is clarified
Abstract
This paper starts with a self-contained discussion of the so-called Akulov-Volkov action S_AV, which is traditionally taken to be the leading-order action of Goldstino field. Explicit expressions for S_AV and its chiral version S_AV^ch are presented. We then turn to the issue on how these actions are related to the leading-order action S_NL proposed in the newly proposed constrained superfield formalism. We show that S_NL may yield S_AV/S_AV^ch or a totally different action S_KS, depending on how the auxiliary field in the former is integrated out. However, S_KS and S_AV/S_AV^ch always yield the same S-matrix elements, as one would have expected from general considerations in quantum field theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
