List Coloring and $n$-monophilic graphs
Radoslav Kirov, Ramin Naimi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the concept of $n$-monophilic graphs, proving that all cycles are $n$-monophilic, characterizing 2-monophilic graphs, and exploring the relationship between $n$-choosability and $n$-monophilicity.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of 2-monophilic graphs and demonstrates that all cycles are $n$-monophilic, advancing understanding of list coloring properties.
Findings
All cycles are $n$-monophilic for all $n$.
Complete characterization of 2-monophilic graphs.
Existence of graphs that are $n$-choosable but not $n$-monophilic.
Abstract
In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko proposed studying the smallest number of list-colorings of a graph among all assignments of lists of a given size to its vertices. We say a graph is -monophilic if this number is minimized when identical -color lists are assigned to all vertices of . Kostochka and Sidorenko observed that all chordal graphs are -monophilic for all . Donner (1992) showed that every graph is -monophilic for all sufficiently large . We prove that all cycles are -monophilic for all ; we give a complete characterization of 2-monophilic graphs (which turns out to be similar to the characterization of 2-choosable graphs given by Erdos, Rubin, and Taylor in 1980); and for every we construct a graph that is -choosable but not -monophilic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
