Study of f_0(980) and f_0(1500) from B_s \to f_0(980)K, f_0(1500)K Decays
Zhi-Qing Zhang

TL;DR
This paper calculates branching ratios and CP asymmetries for specific B_s meson decays into scalar mesons using perturbative QCD, exploring the effects of different mixing angles and schemes.
Contribution
It provides new predictions for decay rates and CP asymmetries in B_s decays involving f_0(980) and f_0(1500), considering various mixing scenarios and angles.
Findings
Branching ratio for B_s → f_0(980)K varies with mixing angle.
Branching ratio for B_s → f_0(1500)K is around 10^{-6} in different schemes.
Large differences in form factors for f_0(1500) scenarios.
Abstract
In this paper, we calculate the branching ratios and CP-violating asymmetries for \bar B^0_s \to f_0(980)K, f_0(1500)K within Perturbative QCD approach based on k_T factorization. If the mixing angle falls into the range of 25^\circ<\theta<40^\circ, the branching ratio of \bar B^0_s\to f_0(980)K is 2.0\times 10^{-6}<{\cal B}(\bar B^0_s\to f_0(980)K)<2.6\times 10^{-6}, while lies in the range of 140^\circ<\theta<165^\circ, {\cal B}(\bar B^0_s\to f_0(980)K) is about 6.5\times 10^{-7}. As to the decay {\cal B}(\bar B^0_s\to f_0(1500)K), when the mixing scheme \mid f_0(1500)>=0.84\mid s\bar s>-0.54\mid n\bar n> for f_0(1500) is used, it is difficult to determine which scenario is more preferable than the other one from the branching ratios for these two scenarios, because they are both close to 1.0\times10^{-6}. But there exists large difference in the form factor F^{\bar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
