Star formation rates and masses of z ~ 2 galaxies from multicolour photometry
C. Maraston (ICG-Portsmouth), J. Pforr (ICG-Portsmouth), A. Renzini, (INAF-Padova Observatory), E. Daddi (CEA-Saclay), M. Dickinson (NOAO-Tucson),, A. Cimatti (University of Bologna), C. Tonini (ICG-Portsmouth)

TL;DR
This study evaluates different star formation history models to accurately derive star formation rates and stellar masses of z ~ 2 galaxies from multicolour photometry, highlighting the effectiveness of inverted-tau models with high-redshift formation assumptions.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that inverted-tau star formation histories with high-redshift start provide more accurate galaxy property estimates than traditional models.
Findings
Inverted-tau models match UV-derived SFRs and extinctions well.
These models accurately recover SFRs and masses of simulated galaxies.
Direct-tau models tend to overestimate SFRs and underestimate stellar masses.
Abstract
Fitting synthetic spectral energy distributions (SED) to the multi-band photometry of galaxies to derive their star formation rates (SFR), stellar masses, ages, etc. requires making a priori assumptions about their star formation histories (SFH). A widely adopted parameterization of the SFH, the so-called tau-models where SFR goes as e^{-t/tau) is shown to lead to unrealistically low ages when applied to star forming galaxies at z ~ 2, a problem shared by other SFHs when the age is left as a free parameter in the fitting. This happens because the SED of such galaxies, at all wavelengths, is dominated by their youngest stellar populations, which outshine the older ones. Thus, the SED of such galaxies conveys little information on the beginning of star formation. To cope with this problem, we explore a variety of SFHs, such as constant SFR and inverted-tau models - with SFR as e^{+t/tau)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
