Analytic and Nash equivalence relations of Nash maps
Masahiro Shiota

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between analytic and Nash equivalence relations of Nash maps, establishing conditions under which they coincide and highlighting differences with analytic map germs.
Contribution
It proves that for compact Nash manifolds, analytic R-L equivalence implies Nash R-L equivalence, and shows local $C^\infty$ R-L equivalence does as well, revealing differences with analytic germs.
Findings
Analytic R-L equivalence implies Nash R-L equivalence for compact Nash manifolds.
Local $C^\infty$ R-L equivalence of Nash map germs implies Nash R-L equivalence.
Existence of analytic map germs that are $C^\infty$ R-L equivalent but not analytically R-L equivalent.
Abstract
Let and be Nash manifolds, and and Nash maps from to . If and are compact and if and are analytically R-L equivalent, then they are Nash R-L equivalent. In the local case, R-L equivalence of two Nash map germs implies Nash R-L equivalence. This shows a difference of Nash map germs and analytic map germs. Indeed, there are two analytic map germs from to which are R-L equivalent but not analytically R-L equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
