A General Framework for Graph Sparsification

TL;DR

This paper introduces a versatile framework for graph sparsification that improves computational efficiency, confirms the effectiveness of standard connectivity sampling, and simplifies proofs for effective resistance and strong connectivity sampling methods.

Contribution

The authors present a generic framework for graph sparsification, improving time complexities and providing simplified proofs for sampling methods, including resolving an open question.

Findings

Improved sparsification algorithms with faster time complexities.

Standard connectivities sampling yields effective sparsifiers, resolving an open question.

Sampling with strong connectivities also produces good sparsifiers, with simplified proofs.

Abstract

Given a weighted graph $G$ and an error parameter $\epsilon > 0$, the {\em graph sparsification} problem requires sampling edges in $G$ and giving the sampled edges appropriate weights to obtain a sparse graph $G_{\epsilon}$ (containing O(n\log n) edges in expectation) with the following property: the weight of every cut in $G_{\epsilon}$ is within a factor of $(1\pm \epsilon)$ of the weight of the corresponding cut in $G$. We provide a generic framework that sets out sufficient conditions for any particular sampling scheme to result in good sparsifiers, and obtain a set of results by simple instantiations of this framework. The results we obtain include the following: (1) We improve the time complexity of graph sparsification from O(m\log^3 n) to O(m + n\log^4 n) for graphs with polynomial edge weights. (2) We improve the time complexity of graph sparsification from O(m\log^3 n) to O(m\log^2 n) for graphs with arbitrary edge weights. (3) If the size of the sparsifier is allowed to be O(n\log^2 n/\epsilon^2) instead of O(n\log n/\epsilon^2), we improve the time complexity of sparsification to O(m) for graphs with polynomial edge weights. (4) We show that sampling using standard connectivities results in good sparsifiers, thus resolving an open question of Benczur and Karger. As a corollary, we give a simple proof of (a slightly weaker version of) a result due to Spielman and Srivastava showing that sampling using effective resistances produces good sparsifiers. (5) We give a simple proof showing that sampling using strong connectivities results in good sparsifiers, a result obtained previously using a more involved proof by Benczur and Karger. A key ingredient of our proofs is a generalization of bounds on the number of small cuts in an undirected graph due to Karger; this generalization might be of independent interest.