Induced CMB quadrupole from pointing offsets
Adam Moss, Douglas Scott, Kris Sigurdson

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether pointing offsets in WMAP data could produce a spurious quadrupole signal, finding that such an effect is unlikely to be significant and highlighting the importance of scan strategy in interpreting CMB anisotropies.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that pointing offsets are unlikely to cause the observed quadrupole and explains the physics behind the coupling between dipole gradients and scan coverage.
Findings
Pointing offsets produce a smaller quadrupole than claimed.
The effect arises from dipole gradient and scan anisotropy convolution.
Planck's different scan strategy reduces this coupling.
Abstract
Recent claims in the literature have suggested that the {\it WMAP} quadrupole is not primordial in origin, and arises from an aliasing of the much larger dipole field because of incorrect satellite pointing. We attempt to reproduce this result and delineate the key physics leading to the effect. We find that, even if real, the induced quadrupole would be smaller than claimed. We discuss reasons why the {\it WMAP} data are unlikely to suffer from this particular systematic effect, including the implications for observations of point sources. Given this evidence against the reality of the effect, the similarity between the pointing-offset-induced signal and the actual quadrupole then appears to be quite puzzling. However, we find that the effect arises from a convolution between the gradient of the dipole field and anisotropic coverage of the scan direction at each pixel. There is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
