No-go Theorem for One-way Quantum Computing on Naturally Occurring Two-level Systems
Jianxin Chen, Xie Chen, Runyao Duan, Zhengfeng Ji, Bei Zeng

TL;DR
This paper proves that it is impossible for naturally occurring two-level (qubit) systems to serve as universal resource states for one-way quantum computing when constrained by realistic Hamiltonian properties.
Contribution
It establishes a no-go theorem showing that no genuinely entangled qubit ground state can be the unique ground state of a suitable two-body frustration-free Hamiltonian.
Findings
Genuinely entangled qubit states cannot be non-degenerate ground states of two-body frustration-free Hamiltonians.
Every spin-1/2 frustration-free Hamiltonian with two-body interactions has a ground state that is a product of single- or two-qubit states.
The result rules out natural qubit systems as universal resource states for one-way quantum computing under specified conditions.
Abstract
One-way quantum computing achieves the full power of quantum computation by performing single particle measurements on some many-body entangled state, known as the resource state. As single particle measurements are relatively easy to implement, the preparation of the resource state becomes a crucial task. An appealing approach is simply to cool a strongly correlated quantum many-body system to its ground state. In addition to requiring the ground state of the system to be universal for one-way quantum computing, we also want the Hamiltonian to have non-degenerate ground state protected by a fixed energy gap, to involve only two-body interactions, and to be frustration-free so that measurements in the course of the computation leave the remaining particles in the ground space. Recently, significant efforts have been made to the search of resource states that appear naturally as ground…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
