Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme
Thomas Scherngell, Michael J. Barber

TL;DR
This paper investigates how geographical separation influences cross-region R&D collaborations in the EU, revealing that industry collaborations are more geographically constrained than public research, with technological distance being a key factor for both.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations using EU data, highlighting the differing impacts of geography.
Findings
Geographical factors significantly influence industrial R&D networks.
Public research collaborations are less affected by geography.
Technological distance is crucial for both sectors.
Abstract
This study compares the spatial characteristics of industrial R&D networks to those of public research R&D networks (i.e. universities and research organisations). The objective is to measure the impact of geographical separation effects on the constitution of cross-region R&D collaborations for both types of collaboration. We use data on joint research projects funded by the 5th European Framework Programme (FP) to proxy cross-region collaborative activities. The study area is composed of 255 NUTS-2 regions that cover the EU-25 member states (excluding Malta and Cyprus) as well as Norway and Switzerland. We adopt spatial interaction models to analyse how the variation of cross-region industry and public research networks is affected by geography. The results of the spatial analysis provide evidence that geographical factors significantly affect patterns of industrial R&D collaboration,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
