A direct link between neutrinoless double beta decay and leptogenesis in a seesaw model with $S_4$ symmetry
Y. H. Ahn, Sin Kyu Kang, C. S. Kim, T. Phong Nguyen

TL;DR
This paper links neutrinoless double beta decay and leptogenesis within an $S_4$ symmetric seesaw model, showing how tiny symmetry-breaking terms enable collider-accessible leptogenesis and predicting decay rates based on CP phases and baryon asymmetry data.
Contribution
It introduces a mechanism for flavored resonant leptogenesis in an $S_4$ symmetric seesaw model with minimal symmetry breaking, connecting high-energy CP phases to low-energy neutrinoless double beta decay predictions.
Findings
Leptogenesis can be achieved at a lowered seesaw scale accessible to colliders.
A direct correlation exists between neutrinoless double beta decay and leptogenesis via CP phases.
Predicted effective neutrino mass $|<m_{ee}>|$ can be constrained by baryon asymmetry observations.
Abstract
We study how leptogenesis can be implemented in a seesaw model with flavor symmetry, which leads to the neutrino tri-bimaximal mixing matrix and degenerate right-handed (RH) neutrino spectrum. Introducing a tiny soft symmetry breaking term in the RH neutrino mass matrix, we show that the flavored resonant leptogenesis can be successfully realized, which can lower the seesaw scale much so as to make it possible to probe in colliders. Even though such a tiny soft breaking term is essential for leptogenesis, it does not significantly affect the low energy observables. We also investigate how the effective light neutrino mass associated with neutrinoless double beta decay can be predicted along with the neutrino mass hierarchies by imposing experimental data of low-energy observables. We find a direct link between leptogenesis and neutrinoless double beta decay…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
