Fundamental defect of the macroeconomic thinking as one of the main causes of the crisis endured
Eugen Perchik

TL;DR
This paper critiques fundamental macroeconomic theories, especially Harrod's model, highlighting how their flawed assumptions inherently lead to economic crises and discussing potential damping strategies.
Contribution
It identifies fundamental flaws in macroeconomic thinking, particularly in Harrod's growth model, and links these flaws to the inevitability of economic crises.
Findings
Harrod's model's assumptions lead to crisis inevitability
Fundamental macroeconomic flaws are identified
Damping strategies can mitigate crises
Abstract
The main points of the first section of the article written by S.I. Chernyshov, A.V. Voronin and S.A. Razumovsky arXiv:1003.4382), which deals with the fundamental bases of the macroeconomic theory, have been analyzed. An incorrectness of the Harrod's model of the economical growth in its generally accepted interpretation was specifically considered. The inevitability of the economic crisis has been shown to follow directly from the premises of this model. At the same time there is an opportunity to realize the damping strategies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic Development and Digital Transformation · Economic and Technological Developments in Russia · Russia and Soviet political economy
