Are the magnetic fields of millisecond pulsars ~ 10^8 G?
Rafael S. de Souza, Reuven Opher

TL;DR
This paper questions the common assumption that millisecond pulsars have magnetic fields around 10^8 G, presenting evidence that their fields may be significantly stronger, which impacts understanding of their evolution and properties.
Contribution
The paper challenges the standard magnetic field estimate of MSPs by providing six lines of evidence suggesting their fields are higher than 10^8 G, proposing alternative scenarios for their magnetic properties.
Findings
Magnetic dipole emission loss estimates are questionable.
Upper limits on magnetic fields in LMXBs may be underestimated.
Direct measurements indicate fields greater than 10^8 G.
Abstract
It is generally assumed that the magnetic fields of millisecond pulsars (MSPs) are G. We argue that this may not be true and the fields may be appreciably greater. We present six evidences for this: (1) The G field estimate is based on magnetic dipole emission losses which is shown to be questionable; (2) The MSPs in low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) are claimed to have G on the basis of a Rayleygh-Taylor instability accretion argument. We show that the accretion argument is questionable and the upper limit G may be much higher; (3) Low magnetic field neutron stars have difficulty being produced in LMXBs; (4) MSPs may still be accreting indicating a much higher magnetic field; (5) The data that predict G for MSPs also predict ages on the order of, and greater than, ten billion years, which is much greater than normal pulsars.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
