On disjoint crossing families in geometric graphs
Radoslav Fulek, Andrew Suk

TL;DR
This paper investigates the maximum number of edges in geometric graphs avoiding certain crossing configurations, establishing bounds and confirming a conjecture for specific cases, with implications for circle graphs.
Contribution
It proves an upper bound of c_k n log n edges for graphs without (k,k)-crossing families and confirms the conjecture for (2,1)-crossing families.
Findings
Graphs without (k,k)-crossing families have at most c_k n log n edges.
Confirmed the conjecture for graphs with no (2,1)-crossing family.
Derived bounds for geometric graphs avoiding specific intersection patterns.
Abstract
A geometric graph is a graph drawn in the plane with vertices represented by points and edges as straight-line segments. A geometric graph contains a (k,l)-crossing family if there is a pair of edge subsets E_1,E_2 such that |E_1| = k and |E_2| = l, the edges in E_1 are pairwise crossing, the edges in E_2 are pairwise crossing, and every edges in E_1 is disjoint to every edge in E_2. We conjecture that for any fixed k,l, every n-vertex geometric graph with no (k,l)-crossing family has at most c_{k,l}n edges, where c_{k,l} is a constant that depends only on k and l. In this note, we show that every n-vertex geometric graph with no (k,k)-crossing family has at most c_kn\log n edges, where c_k is a constant that depends only on k, by proving a more general result which relates extremal function of a geometric graph F with extremal function of two completely disjoint copies of F. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
