Competitive Equilibria in Matching Markets with Budgets
Ning Chen, Xiaotie Deng, Arpita Ghosh

TL;DR
This paper investigates how budget constraints affect the existence and properties of competitive equilibria in matching markets, providing new algorithms for their computation under general utility functions.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of strong stability in markets with budgets and develops a polynomial-time algorithm to determine the existence of competitive equilibria for a broad class of utility functions.
Findings
Competitive equilibria may not always exist with budgets.
Strong stability aligns with competitive equilibria in the budgeted assignment model.
A polynomial-time algorithm can compute minimum equilibria for general utility functions.
Abstract
We study competitive equilibria in the classic Shapley-Shubik assignment model with indivisible goods and unit-demand buyers, with budget constraints: buyers can specify a maximum price they are willing to pay for each item, beyond which they cannot afford the item. This single discontinuity introduced by the budget constraint fundamentally changes the properties of equilibria: in the assignment model without budget constraints, a competitive equilibrium always exists, and corresponds exactly to a stable matching. With budgets, a competitive equilibrium need not always exist. In addition, there are now two distinct notions of stability, depending on whether both or only one of the buyer and seller can strictly benefit in a blocking pair, that no longer coincide due to the budget-induced discontinuity. We define weak and strong stability for the assignment model with transferable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Economic theories and models · Game Theory and Voting Systems
