A Bayesian approach to the semi-analytic model of galaxy formation: methodology

TL;DR

This paper develops a Bayesian framework for semi-analytic galaxy formation models, enabling rigorous sampling of high-dimensional parameter spaces and highlighting the importance of priors and error modeling in interpreting galaxy data.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian inference approach with advanced MCMC to explore the complex parameter space of galaxy formation models.

Findings

Posterior distribution is complex and degenerate.

Narrow priors significantly restrict model inference.

Accurate error modeling is crucial for meaningful results.

Abstract

We believe that a wide range of physical processes conspire to shape the observed galaxy population but we remain unsure of their detailed interactions. The semi-analytic model (SAM) of galaxy formation uses multi-dimensional parameterisations of the physical processes of galaxy formation and provides a tool to constrain these underlying physical interactions. Because of the high dimensionality, the parametric problem of galaxy formation may be profitably tackled with a Bayesian-inference based approach, which allows one to constrain theory with data in a statistically rigorous way. In this paper we develop a SAM in the framework of Bayesian inference. We show that, with a parallel implementation of an advanced Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo algorithm, it is now possible to rigorously sample the posterior distribution of the high-dimensional parameter space of typical SAMs. As an example, we characterise galaxy formation in the current $\Lambda$CDM cosmology using the stellar mass function of galaxies as an observational constraint. We find that the posterior probability distribution is both topologically complex and degenerate in some important model parameters, suggesting that thorough explorations of the parameter space are needed to understand the models. We also demonstrate that because of the model degeneracy, adopting a narrow prior strongly restricts the model. Therefore, the inferences based on SAMs are conditional to the model adopted. Using synthetic data to mimic systematic errors in the stellar mass function, we demonstrate that an accurate observational error model is essential to meaningful inference.