
TL;DR
This paper formalizes the Principle of Decompositional Equivalence in physics, demonstrating its implications for the invariance of physical laws and challenging assumptions in quantum measurement interpretations.
Contribution
It introduces a formalization of Decompositional Equivalence and shows its implications for the limits of experimental verification and the assumptions in quantum mechanics.
Findings
Finite experiments cannot confirm pointer states refer to the same system
Extra-theoretical assumptions are stronger than classicality assumptions
Standard quantum interpretations are logically inconsistent
Abstract
Both classical and quantum mechanics assume that physical laws are invariant under changes in the way that the world is labeled. This Principle of Decompositional Equivalence is formalized, and shown to forbid finite experimental demonstrations that given pointer states |p1> and |p2> refer to the same physical system S. It is then shown that any extra-theoretical assumption that given pointer states |p1> and |p2> with indistinguishable coefficients in a Schmidt basis for the universe refer to the same physical system S is stronger than the assumption of classicality. Standard interpretations of quantum mechanics make such as assumption in analyzing measurement; hence they are logically inconsistent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
