Atmospheric turbulence in phase-referenced and wide-field interferometric images: Application to the SKA

TL;DR

This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate how atmospheric turbulence affects the astrometric precision and sensitivity of the SKA interferometric array in phase-referenced and wide-field radio observations, across different frequencies and conditions.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of atmospheric effects on interferometric imaging and astrometry, offering insights for optimizing SKA observations under various turbulence conditions.

Findings

High-fidelity imaging is achievable between 1-10 GHz despite atmospheric turbulence.

Atmospheric effects significantly reduce sensitivity and positional accuracy outside the 1-10 GHz range.

Sensitivity and image quality are limited by atmospheric conditions, especially at higher and lower frequencies.

Abstract

Phase referencing is a standard calibration procedure in radio interferometry. It allows to detect weak sources by using quasi-simultaneous observations of closeby sources acting as calibrators. Therefore, it is assumed that, for each antenna, the optical paths of the signals from both sources are similar. However, atmospheric turbulence may introduce strong differences in the optical paths of the signals and affect, or even waste, phase referencing for cases of relatively large calibrator-to-target separations and/or bad weather. The situation is similar in wide-field observations, since the random deformations of the images, mostly caused by atmospheric turbulence, have essentially the same origin as the random astrometric variations of phase-referenced sources with respect to the phase center of their calibrators. In this paper, we present the results of a Monte Carlo study of the astrometric precision and sensitivity of an interferometric array (a realization of the Square Kilometre Array, SKA) in phase-referenced and wide-field observations. These simulations can be extrapolated to other arrays by applying the corresponding corrections. We consider several effects from the turbulent atmosphere (i.e., ionosphere and wet component of the troposphere) and also from the antenna receivers. We study the changes in dynamic range and astrometric precision as a function of observing frequency, source separation, and strength of the turbulence. We find that, for frequencies between 1 and 10 GHz, it is possible to obtain images with high fidelity, although the atmosphere strongly limits the sensitivity of the instrument compared to the case with no atmosphere. Outside this frequency window, the dynamic range of the images and the accuracy of the source positions decrease. [...] (Incomplete abstract. Please read manuscript.)