A comparison between grid and particle methods on the statistics of driven, supersonic, isothermal turbulence

TL;DR

This study compares grid-based and particle-based methods for simulating high Mach number turbulence, finding they produce similar statistical results at high resolutions but differ in resolving dense structures and dissipation characteristics.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of Eulerian grid and Lagrangian SPH methods for supersonic turbulence, highlighting their relative strengths and resolution requirements.

Findings

Both codes agree on key statistical properties like velocity spectra and density PDFs.

SPH better resolves dense structures at lower resolutions.

Grid codes are less dissipative in density-weighted statistics.

Abstract

We compare the statistics of driven, supersonic turbulence at high Mach number using FLASH a widely used Eulerian grid-based code and PHANTOM, a Lagrangian SPH code at resolutions of up to 512^3 in both grid cells and SPH particles. We find excellent agreement between codes on the basic statistical properties: a slope of k^-1.95 in the velocity power spectrum for hydrodynamic, Mach 10 turbulence, evidence in both codes for a Kolmogorov-like slope of k^-5/3 in the variable rho^1/3 v as suggested by Kritsuk et al. and a log-normal PDF with a width that scales with Mach number and proportionality constant b=0.33-0.5 in the density variance-Mach number relation. The measured structure function slopes are not converged in either code at 512^3 elements. We find that, for measuring volumetric statistics such as the power spectrum slope and structure function scaling, SPH and grid codes give roughly comparable results when the number of SPH particles is approximately equal to the number of grid cells. In particular, to accurately measure the power spectrum slope in the inertial range, in the absence of subgrid models, requires at least 512^3 computational elements in either code. On the other hand the SPH code was found to be better at resolving dense structures, giving max. densities at a resolution of 128^3 particles that were similar those resolved in the grid code at 512^3 cells, reflected also in the high density tail of the PDF. We find SPH to be more dissipative at comparable numbers of computational elements in statistics of the velocity field, but correspondingly less dissipative than the grid code in the statistics of density weighted quantities such as rho^1/3 v. For SPH simulations of high Mach number turbulence we find it important to use sufficient non-linear beta-viscosity to prevent particle interpenetration in shocks (we require beta=4 instead of the default beta=2).