CMB Constraints on Primordial non-Gaussianity from the Bispectrum (f_{NL}) and Trispectrum (g_{NL} and \tau_{NL}) and a New Consistency Test of Single-Field Inflation
Joseph Smidt, Alexandre Amblard, Christian T. Byrnes, Asantha Cooray,, Alan Heavens, Dipak Munshi

TL;DR
This paper forecasts and constrains primordial non-Gaussianity parameters using CMB data, introduces a new consistency test for single-field inflation, and improves existing limits on au_{NL} and g_{NL}.
Contribution
It presents novel methods for analyzing CMB non-Gaussianity, including a new correction technique and a ratio test for inflation models, with the first forecasts for g_{NL} constraints.
Findings
WMAP 5-year data constrains g_{NL} to -7.4e5 to 8.2e5.
WMAP data improves au_{NL} limit by nearly four orders of magnitude.
Introduces a new consistency test for single-field inflation models.
Abstract
We outline the expected constraints on non-Gaussianity from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) with current and future experiments, focusing on both the third (f_{NL}) and fourth-order (g_{NL} and \tau_{NL}) amplitudes of the local configuration or non-Gaussianity. The experimental focus is the skewness (two-to-one) and kurtosis (two-to-two and three-to-one) power spectra from weighted maps. In adition to a measurement of \tau_{NL} and g_{NL} with WMAP 5-year data, our study provides the first forecasts for future constraints on g_{NL}. We describe how these statistics can be corrected for the mask and cut-sky through a window function, bypassing the need to compute linear terms that were introduced for the previous-generation non-Gaussianity statistics, such as the skewness estimator. We discus the ratio A_{NL} = \tau_{NL}/(6f_{NL}/5)^2 as an additional test of single-field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
