The Mass-Size Relation from Clouds to Cores. II. Solar Neighborhood Clouds
Jens Kauffmann, Thushara Pillai, Rahul Shetty, Philip C. Myers, Alyssa, A. Goodman

TL;DR
This study measures the mass and size of molecular cloud fragments across various scales in the solar neighborhood, revealing different mass-size relations for clouds forming massive stars and those that do not, and identifying potential thresholds for massive star formation.
Contribution
It introduces a dendrogram-based method to characterize cloud fragments over a wide range of scales and compares mass-size relations across different cloud types and star formation activities.
Findings
Clouds not forming massive stars follow m(r) < 870 M_sun (r/pc)^1.33.
Clouds forming massive stars exceed the above relation.
Cluster-forming fragments are more massive at given radii and follow m = C*r^1.27.
Abstract
We measure the mass and size of cloud fragments in several molecular clouds continuously over a wide range of spatial scales (0.05 < r / pc < 3). Based on the recently developed "dendrogram-technique", this characterizes dense cores as well as the enveloping clouds. "Larson's 3rd Law" of constant column density, m(r) = C*r^2, is not well suited to describe the derived mass-size data. Solar neighborhood clouds not forming massive stars (< 10 M_sun; Pipe Nebula, Taurus, Perseus, and Ophiuchus) obey m(r) < 870 M_sun (r / pc)^1.33 . In contrast to this, clouds forming massive stars (Orion A, G10.150.34, G11.110.12) do exceed the aforementioned relation. Thus, this limiting mass-size relation may approximate a threshold for the formation of massive stars. Across all clouds, cluster-forming cloud fragments are found to be---at given radius---more massive than fragments devoid of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
