QMIP = MIP*
Anne Broadbent, Joseph Fitzsimons, Elham Kashefi

TL;DR
This paper proves that the class of languages recognized by quantum multi-prover interactive proof systems (QMIP) is equal to the class recognized by classical systems with shared entanglement (MIP*), showing shared entanglement captures all quantum power in this setting.
Contribution
It establishes QMIP=MIP*, demonstrating shared entanglement suffices to replicate quantum proof system power without quantum verifiers.
Findings
QMIP equals MIP*
Shared entanglement removes the need for quantum verifiers
Quantum information power is captured by entanglement
Abstract
The way entanglement influences the power of quantum and classical multi-prover interactive proof systems is a long-standing open question. We show that the class of languages recognized by quantum multi-prover interactive proof systems, QMIP, is equal to MIP*, the class of languages recognized by classical multi-prover interactive proof systems where the provers share entanglement. After the recent result by Jain, Ji, Upadhyay and Watrous showing that QIP=IP, our work completes the picture from the verifier's perspective by showing that also in the setting of multiple provers with shared entanglement, a quantum verifier is no more powerful than a classical one: QMIP=MIP*. Our techniques are based on the adaptation of universal blind quantum computation (a protocol recently introduced by us) to the context of interactive proof systems. We show that in the multi-prover scenario, shared…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography
