Non-perturbative renormalization of quark bilinear operators with Nf=2 (tmQCD) Wilson fermions and the tree-level improved gauge action
M. Constantinou, P. Dimopoulos, R. Frezzotti, G. Herdoiza, K. Jansen,, V. Lubicz, H. Panagopoulos, G.C. Rossi, S. Simula, F. Stylianou, A. Vladikas

TL;DR
This paper computes non-perturbative renormalization constants for quark bilinear operators using improved gauge and twisted mass fermion actions, employing the RI-MOM scheme and addressing discretization effects.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed non-perturbative renormalization constants for Nf=2 twisted mass fermions with improved gauge action, including subtraction of discretization effects.
Findings
Renormalization constants ZV, ZA, ZP/ZS computed with RI-MOM and alternative methods.
Explicit subtraction of O(g^2 a^2) discretization effects.
Results applicable to both twisted mass and standard Wilson fermions.
Abstract
We present results for the renormalization constants of bilinear quark operators obtained by using the tree-level Symanzik improved gauge action and the Nf=2 twisted mass fermion action at maximal twist, which guarantees automatic O(a)-improvement. Our results are also relevant for the corresponding standard (un-twisted) Wilson fermionic action since the two actions only differ, in the massless limit, by a chiral rotation of the quark fields. The scale-independent renormalization constants ZV, ZA and the ratio ZP/ZS have been computed using the RI-MOM approach, as well as other alternative methods. For ZA and ZP/ZS, the latter are based on both standard twisted mass and Osterwalder-Seiler fermions, while for ZV a Ward Identity has been used. The quark field renormalization constant Zq and the scale dependent renormalization constants ZS, ZP and ZT are determined in the RI-MOM scheme.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
