When does fractional Brownian motion not behave as a continuous function with bounded variation?
Ehsan Azmoodeh, Heikki Tikanm\"aki, Esko Valkeila

TL;DR
This paper investigates the behavior of fractional Brownian motion when composed with smooth functions, revealing that it does not behave as a bounded variation function, unlike continuous functions with bounded variation.
Contribution
The authors prove a new integral representation for the running maximum of bounded variation functions and demonstrate that fractional Brownian motion does not share this property.
Findings
Integral representation for the running maximum of bounded variation functions
Fractional Brownian motion does not behave as a bounded variation function
Itô formula analogy fails for fractional Brownian motion with H > 1/2
Abstract
If we compose a smooth function g with fractional Brownian motion B with Hurst index H > 1/2, then the resulting change of variables formula [or It/^o- formula] has the same form as if fractional Brownian motion would be a continuous function with bounded variation. In this note we prove a new integral representation formula for the running maximum of a continuous function with bounded variation. Moreover we show that the analogue to fractional Brownian motion fails.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Economic theories and models
