Investigating the disc-jet coupling in accreting compact objects using the black hole candidate Swift J1753.5-0127
P. Soleri (1,2), R.P. Fender (3,1), V. Tudose (4,5), D. Maitra (6), M., Bell (3), M. Linares (7), D. Altamirano (1), R. Wijnands (1), T. Belloni (8),, P. Casella (3), J.C.A. Miller-Jones (9), T. Muxlow (10), M. Klein-Wolt (11),, M. Garrett (4,12,13)

TL;DR
This study examines the coupling between accretion and jet ejection in the black hole candidate Swift J1753.5-0127 through a four-year multiwavelength observational campaign, revealing a weaker jet than predicted and thermal disc dominance in near-infrared emission.
Contribution
It provides detailed observational evidence of a faint jet in Swift J1753.5-0127, challenging existing empirical correlations and offering insights into jet properties and accretion processes in such systems.
Findings
Jet is fainter than expected from empirical radio-X-ray correlations.
Near-infrared emission is dominated by thermal disc emission, unusual for this state.
Results have implications for broadband jet modeling and understanding of compact object nature.
Abstract
In studies of accreting black holes in binary systems, empirical relations have been proposed to quantify the coupling between accretion processes and ejection mechanisms. These processes are probed respectively by means of X-ray and radio/optical-infrared observations. The relations predict, given certain accretion conditions, the expected energy output in the form of a jet. We investigated this coupling by studying the black hole candidate Swift J1753.5-0127, via multiwavelength coordinated observations over a period of ~4 years. We present the results of our campaign showing that, all along the outburst, the source features a jet that is fainter than expected from the empirical correlation between the radio and the X-ray luminosities in hard spectral state. Because the jet is so weak in this system the near-infrared emission is, unusually for this state and luminosity, dominated by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
