The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey: Evolution in the Halo Occupation Number since z $\sim$ 1
U. Abbas, S. de la Torre, O. Le F\`evre, L. Guzzo, C. Marinoni, B., Meneux, A. Pollo, G. Zamorani, D. Bottini, B. Garilli, V. Le Brun, D., Maccagni, R. Scaramella, M. Scodeggio, L. Tresse, G. Vettolani, A., Zanichelli, C. Adami, S. Arnouts, S. Bardelli, M. Bolzonella, A. Cappi

TL;DR
This study models the evolution of galaxy occupation in dark matter halos from redshift 1.3 to 0.1 using VVDS data, revealing halo growth, galaxy-halo mass relations, and merger activity consistent with hierarchical structure formation.
Contribution
First to measure high-redshift halo mass evolution from a single survey, demonstrating halo growth and galaxy occupation trends over cosmic time.
Findings
Halo mass increases by 90% from z=1 to 0.5
Halo mass evolution follows exponential form M(z) = M_0 e^{-eta z}
More luminous galaxies occupy more massive halos regardless of redshift
Abstract
We model the evolution of the mean galaxy occupation of dark-matter halos over the range , using the data from the VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey (VVDS). The galaxy projected correlation function was computed for a set of luminosity-limited subsamples and fits to its shape were obtained using two variants of Halo Occupation Distribution models. These provide us with a set of best-fitting parameters, from which we obtain the average mass of a halo and average number of galaxies per halo. We find that after accounting for the evolution in luminosity and assuming that we are largely following the same population, the underlying dark matter halo shows a growth in mass with decreasing redshift as expected in a hierarchical structure formation scenario. Using two different HOD models, we see that the halo mass grows by 90% over the redshift interval z=[0.5,1.0]. This is the first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
