On surfaces of general type with q=5
Margarida Mendes Lopes, Rita Pardini, Gian Pietro Pirola

TL;DR
This paper proves that complex surfaces with irregularity 5 and no irrational pencil of genus >1 must have geometric genus greater than 7, aiding classification and addressing a specific conjecture in algebraic geometry.
Contribution
It establishes a lower bound on the geometric genus for certain surfaces with irregularity 5, providing evidence towards a conjecture about their classification.
Findings
Surfaces with q=5 and no irrational pencil of genus >1 have p_g > 7.
Classifies minimal surfaces of general type with q=5 and p_g<8.
Supports the conjecture that the symmetric product of a genus three curve is unique under these conditions.
Abstract
We prove that a complex surface S with irregularity q(S)=5 that has no irrational pencil of genus >1 has geometric genus p_g(S)>7. As a consequence, one is able to classify minimal surfaces S of general type with q(S)=5 and p_g(S)<8. This result is a negative answer, for q=5, to the question asked in arXiv:0811.0390 of the existence of surfaces of general type with irregularity q>3 that have no irrational pencil of genus >1 and with the lowest possible geometric genus p_g=2q-3. This gives some evidence for the conjecture that the only irregular surface with no irrational pencil of genus >1 and p_g=2q-3 is the symmetric product of a genus three curve.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
