
TL;DR
This paper proves that the set of codes for Ramsey positive analytic sets is highly complex, specifically $oldsymbol{ ext{Σ}}^1_2$-complete, revealing deep connections between different forcing notions and the structure of Ramsey null sets.
Contribution
It establishes the $oldsymbol{ ext{Σ}}^1_2$-completeness of the set of codes for Ramsey positive analytic sets, extending the Hurewicz theorem to a higher projective level.
Findings
The set of codes for Ramsey positive analytic sets is $oldsymbol{ ext{Σ}}^1_2$-complete.
The $oldsymbol{ ext{σ}}$-ideal of Ramsey null sets is not ZFC-correct.
The work draws parallels between Sacks and Mathias forcing.
Abstract
We show that the set of codes for Ramsey positive analytic sets is -complete. This is a one projective-step higher analogue of the Hurewicz theorem saying that the set of codes for uncountable analytic sets is -complete. This shows a close resemblance between the Sacks forcing and the Mathias forcing. In particular, we get that the -ideal of Ramsey null sets is not ZFC-correct. This solves a problem posed by Ikegami, Pawlikowski and Zapletal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
