The Computable Universe Hypothesis
Matthew P. Szudzik (Carnegie Mellon)

TL;DR
This paper defines computable physical models, explores their properties, and formalizes the computable universe hypothesis, suggesting all physical laws may be inherently computable.
Contribution
It introduces a formal definition of computable physical models and connects it with the computable universe hypothesis, expanding the theoretical framework of physical computability.
Findings
Examples of computable models including discrete, continuous, and probabilistic systems
Formulation of models using type-two effectivity (TTE) on topological spaces
Operations like coarse-graining and statistical ensemble formation are computably formalized
Abstract
When can a model of a physical system be regarded as computable? We provide the definition of a computable physical model to answer this question. The connection between our definition and Kreisel's notion of a mechanistic theory is discussed, and several examples of computable physical models are given, including models which feature discrete motion, a model which features non-discrete continuous motion, and probabilistic models such as radioactive decay. We show how computable physical models on effective topological spaces can be formulated using the theory of type-two effectivity (TTE). Various common operations on computable physical models are described, such as the operation of coarse-graining and the formation of statistical ensembles. The definition of a computable physical model also allows for a precise formalization of the computable universe hypothesis--the claim that all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
