Fuzzy Supernova Templates II: Parameter Estimation
Steven A. Rodney, John L. Tonry

TL;DR
This paper extends the SOFT method to estimate redshift and luminosity distance of Type Ia supernovae from photometric data alone, enabling efficient analysis of large survey datasets for cosmological studies.
Contribution
It introduces an extension of the SOFT method for photometric redshift and distance estimation, validated with SDSS and SNLS data, achieving accuracy comparable to spectroscopic methods.
Findings
Redshift residuals RMS_z=0.051 with light curves alone.
Hubble residuals of 0.18 mags with spectroscopic priors.
Reliable redshift and distance measurements without spectroscopic data.
Abstract
Wide field surveys will soon be discovering Type Ia supernovae (SNe) at rates of several thousand per year. Spectroscopic follow-up can only scratch the surface for such enormous samples, so these extensive data sets will only be useful to the extent that they can be characterized by the survey photometry alone. In a companion paper (Rodney and Tonry, 2009) we introduced the SOFT method for analyzing SNe using direct comparison to template light curves, and demonstrated its application for photometric SN classification. In this work we extend the SOFT method to derive estimates of redshift and luminosity distance for Type Ia SNe, using light curves from the SDSS and SNLS surveys as a validation set. Redshifts determined by SOFT using light curves alone are consistent with spectroscopic redshifts, showing a root-mean-square scatter in the residuals of RMS_z=0.051. SOFT can also derive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
