Study of star-forming galaxies in SDSS up to redshift 0.4 II. Evolution from the fundamental parameters: mass, metallicity & SFR
M.A. Lara-Lopez, A. Bongiovanni, J. Cepa, A.M. Perez Garcia, M., Sanchez-Portal, H. O. Castaneda, M. Fernandez Lorenzo, M. Povic

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution of star-forming galaxies up to redshift 0.4 by analyzing metallicity, SFR, and morphology, revealing significant changes consistent with galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It introduces the use of the S2N2 diagnostic diagram for classifying galaxies and demonstrates evolution in metallicity, SFR, and morphology across redshifts.
Findings
S2N2 diagram reliably classifies galaxy types.
Metallicity decreases by ~0.2 dex from z~0.3-0.4 to local universe.
Galaxies show higher SFR and late-type morphology at higher redshifts.
Abstract
To understand the formation and evolution of galaxies, it is important to have a full comprehension of the role played by the metallicity, star formation rate (SFR), morphology, and color. The interplay of these parameters at different redshifts will substantially affect the evolution of galaxies and, as a consequence, the evolution of them will provide important clues and constraints on the galaxy evolution models. In this work we focus on the evolution of the SFR, metallicity of the gas, and morphology of galaxies at low redshift in search of signs of evolution. We use the S2N2 diagnostic diagram as a tool to classify star--forming, composite, and AGN galaxies. We analyzed the evolution of the three principal BPT diagrams, estimating the SFR and specific SFR (SSFR) for our samples of galaxies, studying the luminosity and mass-metallicity relations, and analyzing the morphology of our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
