Physical non-equivalence of the Jordan and Einstein frames
S. Capozziello, P. Martin-Moruno, C. Rubano

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Jordan and Einstein frames in a specific f(R)-gravity model are physically non-equivalent despite their mathematical connection via conformal transformation, based on analytical calculations.
Contribution
It provides a clear analytical demonstration of the physical non-equivalence between the Jordan and Einstein frames in a particular f(R)-gravity model.
Findings
Jordan and Einstein frames are physically non-equivalent.
Analytical calculations confirm non-equivalence.
Mathematical equivalence does not imply physical equivalence.
Abstract
We show, considering a specific f(R)-gravity model, that the Jordan frame and the Einstein frame are physically non-equivalent, although they are connected by a conformal transformation which yields a mathematical equivalence. Since all the calculations are performed analytically, this non-equivalence is shown in an unambiguous way.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
