Comment on the calculation of forces for multibody interatomic potentials
Vitaly A. Kuzkin

TL;DR
This paper examines how different force definitions in multibody interatomic potentials affect stress tensor calculations, highlighting discrepancies depending on the force partitioning method and localization function.
Contribution
It compares two force definitions for multibody potentials and analyzes their impact on stress tensor computation, emphasizing the importance of force partitioning choices.
Findings
Forces coincide only for pair or embedded-atom potentials.
Hardy's stress tensor varies with localization function radius.
Force definition choice significantly influences stress tensor results.
Abstract
The system of particles interacting via multibody interatomic potential of general form is considered. Possible variants of partition of the total force acting on a single particle into pair contributions are discussed. Two definitions for the force acting between a pair of particles are compared. The forces coincide only if the particles interact via pair or embedded-atom potentials. However in literature both definitions are used in order to determine Cauchy stress tensor. A simplest example of the linear pure shear of perfect square lattice is analyzed. It is shown that, Hardy's definition for the stress tensor gives different results depending on the radius of localization function. The differences strongly depend on the way of the force definition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
