A serendipitous survey for variability amongst the massive stellar population of Westerlund 1
J. S. Clark, B. W. Ritchie, I. Negueruela

TL;DR
This study investigates spectroscopic and photometric variability in massive stars of Westerlund 1, revealing pulsations and wind inhomogeneities that inform stellar evolution models and challenge existing theories for high-mass stars.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive variability characterization of Westerlund 1's massive stars using data from the 1960s onward, highlighting pulsations and wind structures across spectral types.
Findings
Spectroscopic variability due to wind asphericity and pulsations observed in both hot and cool stars.
Detection of photospheric pulsations across a range of spectral types, including hypergiants.
Constraints on stellar evolution pathways based on the presence of luminous hypergiants and red supergiants.
Abstract
Massive stars exhibit spectroscopic and photometric variability over a wide range of timescales. However the physical mechanisms driving this behaviour remain poorly understood. Westerlund 1 presents an ideal laboratory for studying these processes in a rich, coeval population of post-main sequence stars and we present a pathfinding study aimed at characterising their variability utilising the large body of data that has accumulated since the 1960s. Spectroscopic variability attributable to both wind asphericity and photospheric pulsations was present amongst both the hot and cool stellar populations. Given the limitations imposed by the data, we were unable to determine the physical origin of the wind structure inferred for the OB supergiants, although the inhomogineities in the winds of the Wolf Rayets are likely driven by binary interactions and, conversely, by pulsations in at least…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
