SuperWASP observations of long timescale photometric variations in cataclysmic variables
N.L. Thomas, A.J. Norton, D.Pollacco, R.G. West, P.J. Wheatley, B., Enoch, and W.I. Clarkson

TL;DR
This study uses SuperWASP data to analyze long-term photometric variations in cataclysmic variables, confirming some theoretical predictions and discovering new modulation periods linked to disc precession and magnetic cycles.
Contribution
It provides the first long-term observational confirmation of disc precession periods in PX And and explores long-term photometric modulations in DQ Her and V795 Her.
Findings
Confirmed negative superhump period in PX And at 0.1417 days.
Improved estimate of PX And's disc precession period to 4.43 days.
Detected a 100-day modulation in DQ Her's eclipse depth, possibly linked to magnetic cycles.
Abstract
We investigated whether the predictions and results of Stanishev et al (2002) concerning a possible relationship between eclipse depths in PX And and its retrograde disc precession phase, could be confirmed in long term observations made by SuperWASP. In addition, two further CVs (DQ Her and V795 Her) in the same SuperWASP data set were investigated to see whether evidence of superhump periods and disc precession periods were present and what other, if any, long term periods could be detected. The results of our period and eclipse analysis on PX And confirm that the negative superhump period is 0.1417 \pm 0.0001d. We find no evidence of positive superhumps in our data suggesting that PX And may have been in a low state during our observations. We improve on existing estimates of the disc precession period and find it to be 4.43 \pm 0.05d. Our results confirm the predictions of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
