Transition probabilities and measurement statistics of postselected ensembles
Tobias Fritz

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effects of intermediate quantum measurements with postselection on transition probabilities, characterizing possible outcome distributions and trade-offs between randomness and transition enhancement.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of measurement statistics in postselected ensembles, establishing constraints and quantifying the limits of transition probability enhancement.
Findings
Measurement can increase transition probability but with limits
Trade-off exists between measurement randomness and transition enhancement
Maximum transition probability increase factor is 2
Abstract
It is well-known that a quantum measurement can enhance the transition probability between two quantum states. Such a measurement operates after preparation of the initial state and before postselecting for the final state. Here we analyze this kind of scenario in detail and determine which probability distributions on a finite number of outcomes can occur for an intermediate measurement with postselection, for given values of the following two quantities: (i) the transition probability without measurement, (ii) the transition probability with measurement. This is done for both the cases of projective measurements and of generalized measurements. Among other constraints, this quantifies a trade-off between high randomness in a projective measurement and high measurement-modified transition probability. An intermediate projective measurement can enhance a transition probability such that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
