Complexity and anisotropy in host morphology make populations safer against epidemic outbreaks
Francisco J. Perez-Reche, Sergei N. Taraskin, Luciano da F. Costa,, Franco M. Neri, and Christopher A. Gilligan

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that morphological complexity and anisotropy in hosts such as plants, animals, or social networks decrease epidemic outbreak likelihood, providing analytical bounds for invasion thresholds in epidemiological models.
Contribution
The paper introduces analytical estimates linking host morphological features to invasion thresholds, highlighting how complexity and anisotropy enhance population resistance.
Findings
Disorder in host morphology reduces epidemic probability.
Analytical bounds for invasion thresholds are derived.
Host shape characteristics inform invasion risk assessments.
Abstract
One of the challenges in epidemiology is to account for the complex morphological structure of hosts such as plant roots, crop fields, farms, cells, animal habitats and social networks, when the transmission of infection occurs between contiguous hosts. Morphological complexity brings an inherent heterogeneity in populations and affects the dynamics of pathogen spread in such systems. We have analysed the influence of realistically complex host morphology on the threshold for invasion and epidemic outbreak in an SIR (susceptible-infected-recovered) epidemiological model. We show that disorder expressed in the host morphology and anisotropy reduces the probability of epidemic outbreak and thus makes the system more resistant to epidemic outbreaks. We obtain general analytical estimates for minimally safe bounds for an invasion threshold and then illustrate their validity by considering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
