Evidence against the young hot-Jupiter around BD +20 1790
P. Figueira (1), M. Marmier (1), X. Bonfils (2), E. di Folco (3), S., Udry (1), N. C. Santos (4), C. Lovis (1), D. Megevand (1), C. H. F. Melo (5),, F. Pepe (1), D. Queloz (1), D. Segransan (1), A. H. M. J. Triaud (1), and P., Viana Almeida (4

TL;DR
This study challenges previous claims of a hot-Jupiter around BD +20 1790 by showing that observed radial-velocity variations are due to stellar activity, not a planetary companion.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed radial-velocity analysis demonstrating that stellar activity, not a planet, causes the observed signals around BD +20 1790.
Findings
Radial-velocity variations are linked to stellar rotation and activity.
No evidence supports the existence of a hot-Jupiter around BD +20 1790.
Stellar activity mimics planetary signals in radial-velocity data.
Abstract
Context. The young active star BD +20 1790 is believed to host a substellar companion, revealed by radial-velocity measurements that detected the reflex motion induced on the parent star. Aims. A complete characterisation of the radial-velocity signal is necessary in order to assess its nature. Methods. We used CORALIE spectrograph to obtain precise (~10 m/s) velocity measurements on this active star, while characterizing the bisector span variations. Particular attention was given to correctly sample both the proposed planetary orbital period, of 7.8 days, and the stellar rotation period, of 2.4 days. Results. A smaller radial-velocity signal (with peak-to-peak variations <500 m/s) than had been reported previously was detected, with different amplitude on two different campaigns. A periodicity similar to the rotational period is found on the data, as well as a clear correlation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
