Reply to comment on "Doping Driven ($\pi,0$) Nesting and Magnetic Properties of Fe$_{1+x}$Te Superconductors"

TL;DR

This paper defends the idea that nesting at ($ ext{ extpi}$,0) is responsible for FeTe's magnetic behavior, emphasizing the importance of correlation effects in theoretical models to match experimental data.

Contribution

It clarifies the role of correlation effects in accurately modeling the magnetic properties of FeTe and reaffirms the significance of ($ ext{ extpi}$,0) nesting in its magnetism.

Findings

Correlation effects are crucial for quantitative agreement with experiments.

Nesting at ($ ext{ extpi}$,0) remains a key factor in FeTe's magnetic behavior.

Original hypothesis about nesting-driven magnetism is supported after including correlations.

Abstract

Inclusion of correlation effects affects quantitatively the agreement with experiment as far as the value of energy shift and the level of doping is concerned, and our original statement that nesting at ($\pi$,0) can be responsible for magnetic behavior of FeTe is hereby reinstated.